JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 13, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Herman Cristobal Gorcira Contreras Vs. Consejo Superior De La Judicatura

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó a la Subsección B de la Sección Cuarta del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura y la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.

Lo anterior, toda vez que la Corte considera que, en estas específicas circunstancias y con el fin de permitir el goce efectivo de las garantías constitucionales de imparcialidad y de segunda instancia en el trámite de tutela, las reglas de competencia del Decreto 1382 de 2000 no son aplicables, por lo cual habrá de acudirse a la regla general en materia de competencia señalada en el Art. 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (20 points)
  1. Ordenar a la Subseccion B de la Seccion Cuarta del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca asumir de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela presentada por el senor Herman Cristobal Gorcira Contreras, contra la Sala Administrativa del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura y la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
  2. EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
  5. Magistrado
  6. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  7. Magistrado
  8. MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  9. Magistrado
  10. JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
  11. Magistrado
  12. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  13. Magistrado
  14. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  15. Magistrado
  16. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  17. Magistrado
  18. CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
  19. Magistrada
  20. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.